Yan Ming, member of the CPPCC National Committee: encourage property management companies to transform and upgrade into modern service enterprises

China Youth Network Beijing three month seven By wire （ Journalist of the People's Political Consultative Conference Zhang Chunli ）"The deep-seated reason for many problems in property management is that there is no modern governance mechanism for property management," said Yan Ming, a member of the CPPCC National Committee.

Yan Ming found in his research that, forty-three It successively exists in the region with a population of 10000 eight hundred and thirty More property disputes and complaints involving one point eight 10000 person times ； About accounting for 13； In the mayor's hotline, complaints in the property field account for about 37% This situation is universal throughout the country.

Yan Ming believes that the prominent problems related to property management at present are mainly manifested in the difficulty in protecting the common rights and interests of owners, and some owners over protect their rights; The owner's participation rate and decision-making rate are low, and it is difficult to establish the owner's meeting and the industry committee, record and operate; The property management company has low threshold, pays more attention to fees, neglects services, and does not disclose revenue and expenditure; After the property conflict occurs, relevant government departments "Can't shout", "Can't control", "No way".

To this end, Yan Ming suggested that the existing property management mechanism should be reformed and guaranteed by legislation, and the focus of social governance should be moved down to the grass-roots level; Implement classified management, and establish a practical property management model and policy guidance for newly-built, old, resettlement areas, and urban-rural fringe areas; Increase policy support and encourage property management companies to transform and upgrade to modern service-oriented enterprises; Create positive energy for social organizations, free the government from market economic behavior, and form a long-term governance mechanism with positive interaction between government governance, social self-regulation, and owner autonomy.